Copyright 2019 by Gary L. Pullman
What we have
here is a failure to communicate.
To write an effective
sentence—a sentence that communicates exactly what you mean—you
should practice the follow these principles:
Use active voice.
(Active voice results from using an active subject and an action
verb. Often, the verb is transitive: in other words, it has a direct
object.)
Use the third person.
(All nouns, all indefinite pronouns, and all third-person personal
pronouns are in the third person.)
Be concise. (Use only
the words that are necessary to communicate your precise meaning.)
Write with purpose
and deliberation, with a specific intention, or aim.
Start with a kernel
sentence. (A kernel sentence is the shortest possible sentence that
you can construct about a topic. Often, a kernel sentence consists
of only an active subject and an action verb.)
After writing a
kernel sentence about your topic, consider what information you need
to add to communicate the exact meaning you have in mind. Also
consider what additional information, if any, your reader is likely
to need to know about the topic as you are writing about it in this
particular sentence.) According to philosopher and rhetorician
Kenneth Burke, all communication addresses only one or more of these
questions: Who? What? When? Where? How? Why? How many or how much?
Knowing this about communication can help you to decide what
information is necessary to include in any sentence concerning any
topic.
Let's practice this
approach.
Suppose you are writing
about the topic of sharks' attacks.
Start your sentence with
these words. “Sharks” is your subject; “attack” is your
action verb:
Sharks
attack.
Ask yourself,
WHAT about shark attacks? (What point do you intend to
communicate about a shark attack?)
Sharks attack
rarely.
What else do
you intend to say about shark attacks?
Sharks attack
rarely, and these attacks are seldom fatal.
What is your
purpose in communicating
these facts? What do you intend
to communicate? Perhaps you intend
to correct a misconception, such as:
Media
reports suggest that sharks attack people frequently.
If
this is the case, relate your goal (correcting a misconception about
shark attacks) to the sentence you have already written (about the
rarity and relative non-lethal number of shark attacks):
Media
reports suggest that sharks attack people frequently,
but sharks attack rarely, and
these attacks are seldom fatal.
To emphasize your point, you can add a phrase such as
“in reality”:
Media
reports suggest that sharks attack people frequently, but, in
reality, sharks attack
rarely, and
these attacks are seldom fatal.
Let's
review what intentions
motivated you to construct each new, expanded version of this kernel
sentence.
You started with a kernel sentence about a specific
topic: “Sharks attack.”
You identified the first point you wanted to communicate
about the topic of your sentence: “rarely.”
You decided to add a pertinent fact to the sentence:
“and these attacks are seldom fatal.”
You
identified your purpose in
writing these facts, which was to correct a misconception: “Media
reports suggest that sharks attack people frequently.”
You
related your purpose to the facts that you had already communicated:
“Media reports suggest that sharks attack people frequently, but
sharks attack rarely, and
these attacks are seldom fatal.”
Finally, you used a phrase to emphasize your point: “in
reality.”
As
a result of this process, using your intent
to determine the content of your sentence, you went from the kernel
sentence “Sharks attack” to its final, expanded, complete
version: “Media reports suggest that sharks attack people
frequently, but, in reality, sharks attack rarely, and these attacks
are seldom fatal.”
This approach can work for any sentence concerning any
topic.